{"id":2356,"date":"2019-10-02T19:50:21","date_gmt":"2019-10-02T19:50:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/shop\/the-lithospheric-setting-of-carlin-type-deposits-an-important-clue-to-their-genetic-associations-and-deposit-associates\/"},"modified":"2020-02-24T18:17:13","modified_gmt":"2020-02-24T18:17:13","slug":"the-lithospheric-setting-of-carlin-type-deposits-an-important-clue-to-their-genetic-associations-and-deposit-associates","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/shop\/the-lithospheric-setting-of-carlin-type-deposits-an-important-clue-to-their-genetic-associations-and-deposit-associates\/","title":{"rendered":"The lithospheric setting of Carlin-type deposits: An important clue to their genetic associations and deposit associates"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Carlin-type deposits have traditionally been regarded as a deposit class for which
\nworld-class examples are largely restricted to northern Nevada, although some global
\nanalogs have been suggested. Economic geology research, which has been largely
\nbased on the deposits themselves, has not delivered an unequivocal genetic model,
\nalthough a late Eocene (ca 42\u201336 Ma) timing of mineralization, coeval with intrusive
\nmagmatism in the broader district, is well established.
\nAt the continental or lithospheric scale, the \u201cunique\u201d Carlin-type deposits occupy
\na similar, but anomalous tectonic niche to the zoned Bingham Canyon porphyry system
\nand the intrusion-related gold deposits (IRGDs) of the Tombstone-Tungsten belt,
\nYukon. Unlike most epigenetic gold deposits in metamorphic belts, all of these metallogenic
\ndistricts are hosted in previously thrusted and folded, miogeosynclinal, calcareous
\nPaleozoic to Mesozoic sedimentary sequences above Precambrian subcontinental
\nlithospheric mantle (SCLM). In addition, the districts share a similar relative tectonic
\ntiming, with mineralizing events taking place at the onset of regional extension, immediately
\nfollowing the cessation of protracted compression. Both the zoned Bingham
\ndistrict and zoned Tombstone-Tungsten belt owe their metal endowment to the intrusion
\nof anomalous magmas, involving a component of basic alkaline melt from metasomatically-
\nenriched domains within the SCLM. Avariety of evidence suggests this is
\nalso a permissive model for Carlin-type deposits due to their broad spatial and temporal
\nrelationship to magmatism in the same terrane, if not in the immediate ore environment.
\nIt is also consistent with the lack of any other geologically reasonable
\nthermal engine to drive the hydrothermal systems given deposit control by compressional
\nstructural geometries related to earlier orogeny, insignificant to no coeval volcanism,
\nand minimal extension in Carlin-type districts relative to surrounding areas
\nof the Basin and Range Province.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":4766,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":""},"product_cat":[154],"product_tag":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/2356"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2356"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=2356"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.gsnv.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=2356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}